Challenges Facing the Global Human Rights Regime
Student’s Name
Institution Affiliation
Course Name
Professor’s Name
Date of Submission
The Challenges in Global Human Rights Regime
Introduction
It is undeniable that today’s human rights standards and claims are in trouble. In the twenty-first century, the situation has drastically deteriorated for successful, let alone perceived, fair international human rights mobilizations and actions. As any news headline highlights, the institutional framework intended to protect those in danger seldomly and sporadic attention is paid to calls for justice and accountability. Despite this, the global human rights reign’s integrated law is a remarkable accomplishment. People’s rights have several traditional elements built and have encircled the country and the world’s law since the end of the cold war about 1980. However, some academics have questioned the international human rights movement’s contribution to internal diversity, highlighting political and moral injustices in the larger community. Therefore, the Global Human Rights Regime is ignoring the danger of complications brought on by local, national, and regional politics. This essay presents Hopgood’s contention and interpretation to examine the international human rights framework’s difficulties.
Arguments by Hopgood
Human rights remain; a crucial component in ensuring social transformation is a troubling subject. Considering this to be the appropriate question at this time, as (Mills & Payne, 2020) demonstrate, answering “no” would suggest that human rights would not be a factor in social change that was effective in growing. According to the research (Sendroiu, 2019), in support of Hobgood s answer, human rights have not reached a positive state. However, there will be more discussion than ever before concerning this issue. Hopgood also asserted that even though he had stated that a particular feature would lead to debate intensively, this would still be treated fairly and favorably in courts of law. The concept should focus on who the global human rights movement represents to accomplish long-term change.
Assessment of Hopgood’s Argument
Many people have also noticed that it is a comical accessory to Hopgood’s plot to dominate human rights by making the laws unattractive. Human rights issues are supposedly not the stuff of movies, but they are perceived as confused when viewed in terms of complexity scales. The study also demonstrated that it would not be praised for a particular testosterone-fueled hero’s quest in violating human rights rules, as opposed to the interconnected, mutually dependent global gestures. The report noted the underlined importance and the need for people to reach out to one another and engage them in the battle or conflict. Additionally, working together mutually as opposed to its destructive aspect is up to an individual wish (Gilder, 2018). Consequently, I strongly agree that Hopgood’s argument is a great attempt to determine the actual bravery of human rights campaigners and, therefore, subtle for fighting regarding human rights.
Conclusion
The preponderance of academics has challenged how much the global human rights movement has contributed to internal diversity, highlighting political and moral disparities in society and, more broadly. There are conceivably three major political shifts at play in the world. This essay examines Hopgood’s contention and its analysis concerning issues that the universal human rights system must counter. Whether human rights remain crucial in ensuring social transformation is a troubling subject. Whether human rights remain essential to ensuring social change is a troublesome subject. Long-term transformation requires the international human rights movement remain at the forefront of the human rights debate. It’s a tacky addition by Hopgood
Get Custom Human Rights Essays
Need an academic paper on human rights that stands out? We specialize in crafting unique, well-researched essays to help you excel. Click ORDER NOW and let us handle your academic challenges!
References
Gilder, A. (2018). Stephen Hopgood, Jack Snyder and Leslie Vinjamuri (Eds), Human Rights Futures. Human Rights Law Review, 18(2), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy011
Mills, K., & Payne, R. A. (2020). America First and the human rights regime. Journal of Human Rights, 19(4), 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2020.1809362
Sendroiu, I. (2019). Human rights as uncertain performance during the Arab Spring. Poetics, 73, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.01.003