Introduction
Social welfare policies refer to the selections of ideologies defining the benefits offered, the beneficiaries, method of delivery, and the financial criteria used. Making choices concerning knowledgeable procedures requires major rudiments of the framework. The elements articulations occur in terms of bases, types, policies, and finance. The framework put more attentions on four types of choices including the nature and volume of benefits, types of risks to be enclosed, means of finance, and the management structure. The measurement of choice covers the whole field of social welfare strategies. The notion of this paper is to discuss the elements of the analytical framework, which include bases of social allocation, provisions and deliver strategies for the allocations.
People Also Read
- Enhancing Personal Well-being: Strategies for Optimal Health
- The Prevalence of Plagiarism among Politicians and Its Consequences
The bases of social allocations
The Great Britain Healthcare System bases provision, focus on the individuals who may gain from a social welfare. Social welfare strategies include the description of beneficiaries of the executed policy. Nearly all the members of a community enjoy the benefits of new policies (Ambrosino, 2008). Even though, the distributions of the immediate benefits can sometimes take place among the segments of the different population. The policies of social wellbeing cannot be beneficial to everyone in the society. The welfare focuses on families with dependent children, the aged, and partially and total disabled individuals (Gilbert & Terrell, 2002). For instance, a welfare strategy designed for the aged may not be valuable to all the old persons in a community. A Large percentage of individuals may gain from it, but some may end up unaccounted.
The providers can apply different methodologies, for every group to receive the services. The first approach involves delivering the Aid in the form of money or tax relief to the less fortuned individuals (Ginsberg & Miller, 2005). In return, this helps create news business ideas or expand the already existing enterprises. Financial assistance for business capital is valuable to the disadvantaged. Creation of more businesses, increase job chances for many people. The dependents and jobless also gain indirectly from the service provident. Increased workforce helps to reduce crime rates among local communities. The relief on tax collected from the businesses initiates making huge profits. The existing business attracts persons with more income, to direct their investments to business.
The second approach suggests on giving direct assistance to the needy of social welfare in the form of goods or services. Services such free laundry to street family, can as beneficial as giving them new clothes and food (Ambrosino, 2008). Service providers can collect the fund required from taxation of people with more income or donations from non-disadvantaged individuals. The disadvantaged can also get services from governmental and non-governmental institutions such as health care, day care, housing, and many other non-financial services.
Moran, 2008 explained that the issue of the value of service delivery is another basis of social allocation. According to the Great Britain Healthcare System, the less fortune should be help directly since they need immediate service to their daily requirements (Maier & Shobayashi, 2001). As they spend the funds provided to them, they promote economic development as well. However, there is a group of community, which require indirect and long-term help such money to start a business. In the end, the high-income individuals spend their earnings to expand the existing business, hence creating job opportunities for the less fortune.
Types of social provisions
The increased demand for social amenities and welfare pose the need for choice dimension. The Great Britain Healthcare System planners have a variety of choices to make regarding the circumstances, the desirability, and public demand. The developers use several criteria to regulate individual eligible for the provisions (Ginsberg & Miller, 2005). They use certain standards such as residence, employment status, family size, health, age, military service, ethnicity, religion, income, gender, age, and marital status. The organizers’ major concern is investigating the entitled bases of social allocations. They use the general principle method to address the issues of choice when designing eligibility cases.
The bases of social allocation relate to the procedures for the operative descriptions of suitability criteria. The determination of the nature of social provision policies depends on the choice of the planners (Gilbert & Terrell, 2002). The main purpose is to identify the differences in the forms of social provisions and the direct insinuations for the consumers of the social welfare benefits. The traditional choices criteria apply benefits such as, goods or service and money (Moran, 2008). Other benefits include, power, vouchers, and opportunities, related to the social polices demand of the recipients. Social provisions developers have the nature of identifying the benefits delivered to the customers.
According to Gilbert and Terrell (2002), the value of the contribution to social service delivery is to achieve the objectives of the policy. The insubstantial quality of casework makes it difficult to specify the type of provisions to the community. The Great Britain Healthcare System social policy, meets the challenge of being affected by values and beliefs, but not as simple as a practical apprehension (Moran, 2008). Financial assistance can be in a form of housing, family planning, day care, nutrition assistance or counseling.
Strategies for the delivery of provisions
The delivery of provisions indicates how the distribution of necessities takes place among the beneficiaries. It proceeds the decision of the planners on the choice of policy and the beneficiaries. Later, the Great Britain Healthcare System planners prepare on delivering the identified provisions as indicated in the eligibility criteria for consumers (Ginsberg & Miller, 2005).This element of dimension depends on the bases of allocation and the provisions. The method of designing delivery systems relies on the objectives of the first two dimensions. The main aim of social welfare if to meet the goals set during the identification process of who should benefit from the provisions. Therefore, it is crucial for the choice of delivery to meet the objectives.
The expression of policy guidelines related to sustainability of beneficiaries occurs through the mechanism of delivery and the nature of operational provisions. The guideline used comes from those prepared during the identification of provisions. Assistance required delivering the new strategies count on the existing choices made earlier (Maier & Shobayashi, 2001). The consumers and providers should come together to organize the delivery methods. The system of the local community involves cities, countries, or neighbors. These groups, with the assistance of the developers, arrange on how the consumers receive their service or goods.
The flow of form delivery providers to beneficiaries follows the strategies of provision system design. The federal social service reductions happened in the early 1980s, which caused a decreased attention among the providers and consumer (Ginsberg & Miller, 2005). Assistance provision evolved from services to such as food and housing, to money. The delivery methods changed after this. A steady incline in the demand for the welfare services among the most community began, especially those from low and middle classes (Ginsberg & Miller, 2005). The increased attention received more courtesy to strategize restricting amenities and for constricting activities, which are valuable to the private sector but funded by the public. Hence, calling for the need for policy analysis for delivery services.
Welfare services can as well involve the provision of finance to the public. When viewing the benefits allocated for social amenities and services, it needs a choice of the delivery mechanism. The major concern is the type of finance and their sources (Gilbert & Terrell, 2002). The providers do not only consider the benefits of receiving funds, but also the method of delivery used. This help in illuminating the beginning and the end of finance allocated (Moran, 2008). Financial choices comprise its flow from the original point to the point of delivery, and the source of the fund. For instance, an organization providing a welfare services to a community should allocate a stable source of funds needed to reach the set goal.
The Great Britain Healthcare System’s choice of finance delivery depends on the organizational preparations on the mode of services to provide. It can be in financial or non-financial forms. Funds contribution can be from donors, public, private sectors or missed sources (Ambrosino, 2008). Financial alternatives depend on the level of state involvement such as the mount of taxation by the government. It is because, the delivery system changed from local states to the federal government over time. The emphasis is on the choices made, which should be interdependent in the welfare policy design. In most cases, regionalized provision system emerges when the social provisions are in a form of power or status.
Reference
Ambrosino, R. (2008). Social work and social welfare: An introduction. Australia: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
Gilbert, N., & Terrell, P. (2002). Dimensions of social welfare policy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Ginsberg, L. H., & Miller-Cribbs, J. (2005). Understanding social problems, policies, and programs. Columbia: University of South Carolina.
Maier, L., & Shobayashi, M. (2001). Multi-functionality: Towards an analytical framework. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Moran, M. (2008). The Oxford handbook of public policy. Oxford [u.a.: Oxford Univ. Press.
With a student-centered approach, I create engaging and informative blog posts that tackle relevant topics for students. My content aims to equip students with the knowledge and tools they need to succeed academically and beyond.